Tuesday, January 31, 2012

JustPictures! Just Fabulous



The other day, tired of accessing Flickr on my mobile browser, i was searching for Flickr for the Android.  Its rating wasn't that high.  But in the similar app recommendations, i saw JustPictures!, which sounded quite promising as you can seamlessly access the pics of your friends, wherever they might be:
  • Flickr
  • Picasa
  • Smugmug
  • Photobucket
  • Deviant Art, etc.
After pottering around it for a couple of days, i feel it's a must-have app.  Don't miss it!

Here's a screenshot of my contact set:

JustPictures! Home - List of accounts

and some of the sets:

JustPictures! Butterflies and Moths

and:

JustPictures! Top 100 Most Interesting

A very neat feature is the Browse by Tags set, right at the top of contact sets.  Prepare to be surprised!  The thumbnail that shows up for this set is not in your control :-)

Why are they giving away such a great app for free?  Not too sure, but it's on code.google.com.


Monday, January 30, 2012

An Evening Out


Last Friday, Marty had to attend the valedictory of his seniors at school (here's the 2010 one).  Since our driver was on leave, i offered to drop him.

It's a lovely ride, full of greenery, and it's one drive i still don't mind doing in chaotic Bangalore.

Once i dropped him off, i was wondering what to do.  The day was still young, as they say :-)

Earlier that morning, i had a dream of visiting a Mariamman temple, in which i distinctly saw myself offering a rupee.

There's a temple at the (Dommasandra) junction where the road from Varthur via Gunjur meets Sarjapur Road (see).  I was thinking that the temple had either a Mariamman or the Old Mother and so i turned left after exiting Greenwood.


Parked at Narayani restau (now with a new name and management) a little further on Sarjapur Road and walked over to the junction.  Of late, i always fold the INR 500 notes inside the INR 100 ones and carry them Chinese fashion, rolled up in a … ;-) band.


There was no Mariamman / Old Mother there, and it turned out to be a samadhi mandir of an avadhuta Sri Govardana Swami:
Avadhuta (Sanskrit: अवधूत avadhūta) is a Sanskrit term used in Indian religions to refer to an antinomian mystic or saint who is beyond ego-consciousness, duality and common worldly concerns and acts without consideration for standard social etiquette. Such personalities "roam free like a child upon the face of the Earth". An avadhūta does not identify with his mind or body or 'names and forms' (Sanskrit: namarupa). Such a person is held to be pure consciousness (Sanskrit: caitanya) in human form.
In fact, it didn't look as if anyone was there, and i had to call out a bit.  One sweet-looking person, called Nagaraj, came out from the dim room to the left of the samadhi and gave me the arati.

Avadhuta Sri Govardana Swami

Sri Nagaraj, who has been staying out here since 2003, gave me a brief history of himself:

He's from Bhadravathi.  He was working in L&T, Yelahanka for a while and left the job around 1998.  He disconnected from his family as well.  For a while, he was moving from ashram to ashram, when, sometime in 2003, he had a dream in which the avadhuta asked him to come to His samadhi.

So he settled down there.  After some time, Sri Nagaraj had a startling experience when the avadhuta came out of His samadhi, hugged him, and whispered the beeja mantra in his right ear.  Sri Nagaraj clarified that the experience didn't happen in a dream, but in regular life.  Since then, he's been staying here.  On the few occasions that he goes to holy places such as Kashi, a person called Krishna Murthy (a devotee of Lord Hanuman, who stays at the place and hardly ever talks) looks after the samadhi mandir.

He told me a wee bit about the avadhuta as well:  Sri Govardhana Swami is from North India and was, of course, a realized soul.  He would eat pieces of glass and even razor blades.  He'd hesitate to pee on Mother Earth and would cup the urine in his hands and drink it!  On the few occasions that he'd eat a banana at a shop, the shopkeeper would find that he'd sell all his produce in a jiffy and make a handsome profit.  That was one of the signals to regular folks that they were in the midst of an avadhuta, i believe.

To the right of the samadhi mandir, there was another (samadhi) of a lady devotee, called Sri Krishnanamma (hope i got that right).  She was a devotee of the Avadhuta, who took up sannyas after two years of marriage (no kids).  Every year, around mid January, a major celebration is held here.

Sri Krishnamma vAru

It was nice, listening to all that from a chap who's renounced.  It didn't look as if he was missing much.

On the way back, i stopped off at the Sacred Grove, between TISB (on the right) and Inventure Academy (on the left).

I love trees and, IMHO, this is a very serene spot.  Makeshift temples adorn the area.

Behemoth of a Banyan

It was very nice to sit below this monster!

One could see mynah, squirrels (and squirelettes), and green parrots in the foliage.  After some time, the many bee-hives came into view.  There were as many as those further in the tree down the road (near the Dommasandra junction).  A cow waddled along, pestered by some geese (or heron).

It was all so magical.  Was once more reminded of that uplifting experience of Swami Ashokananda:
When he (Swami Ashokananda) was near trees, his mind would sometimes grow very quiet, and his ordinary consciousness, human consciousness, would be obliterated, as it were, and tree consciousness would take its place, a consciousness entirely unlike our own—a different time sense, a different way of knowing and feeling, indescribable in terms of human consciousness. He felt at one with trees, just as we feel at one with human beings. He knew trees to be very happy, peaceful beings. He could almost hear their laughter. It was, he said, like the laughter of young girls around sixteen or seventeen years old, and yet restrained.
It was getting dark, so i headed back.

Sunset over Sacred Grove

The magic for the evening wasn't done.

When i got back, Novak Djokovic won a marathon match against Andy "Always a bridesmaid, never a bride" Murray and a moth hovered over him as he lay prone after a debilitating semi-final.

Moth à Djokovic

Suzanne White commented:
People really don't understand the bond between a moth and its master. That moth is Djokovic's pet moth. His name, for anyone who's interested, is Rappaport. He's a special type of moth, bred for company. They can't talk. That's why men like to keep them as pets. They don't remind them of their wives.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Spiritual Classics on the Kindle


Was feeling a bit tired to do the puja this morning. So i read a few snippets from these spiritual classics on my Kindle.
You can download all these from Google Docs by clicking the above links and using the Download button. If you have an issue with any of the above links, try opening that link in an incognito window of the Chrome browser.

Apart from the above links on Google Docs, you can also download the Kindle versions of all these and then some from my Kindle download page.


There was a nice point of similarity during the readings.  From Visit to Vidyasagar in the Gospel:
"Once a salt doll went to measure the depth of the ocean. ( All laugh.) It wanted to tell others how deep the water was. But this it could never do, for no sooner did it get into the water than it melted. Now who was there to report the ocean's depth?"
while from Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi:
Talk 5. Mr. M. Frydman, an engineer, remarked on the subject of Grace, "A salt doll diving into the sea will not be protected by a waterproof coat". It was a very happy simile and was applauded as such. Maharshi added, "The body is the waterproof coat."



Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Playing Second Fiddle


Q: Which is the musical instrument that is most difficult to play?

With devotees thronging the Sadguru, i am always intrigued by the sideshows along the way.  How does one devotee react when another is shown, say, more grace?

Ramana Sadguru was quite nonchalant about it.  He would say that He couldn't do anything if one devotee brought a small cup to the ocean and another a large one.  From the Reminiscences of Prof. GV Subbaramayya:
One day in December 1939, Devaraja Mudaliar, an intimate devotee, asked how Bhagavan could observe distinction among His devotees. "For instance", he added, "Shall we be wrong if we say that Subbaramayya is shown a little more favour than others?”  Bhagavan smilingly replied, "To me there is no distinction. Grace is flowing like the ocean ever full. Every one draws from it according to capacity. How can one who brings only a tumbler complain that he is not able to take as much as another who brought a jar?"
There are a couple of instances in the Shri Sai Satcharita where devotees raise such issues with Baba, who then clarifies (but that's besides the point).  From Chapter 11:
Dadabhat worshipped Baba. Nobody until then dared to apply sandal paste to Baba's forehead. Only Mhalsapati used to apply it to His throat. But this simple-hearted devout, Dr. Pandit, took Dabadhat's dish containing Puja-materials and taking sandal-paste out of it, drew a Tripundra, i.e. there horizontal lines on Baba's forehead. To the surprise of all, Baba kept silent without uttering a single word. Then Dababhat that evening asked Baba, "How is it, that though You object to the sandal-paste being applied by others to Your forehead, but You allowed Dr. Pandit to do so now?"
and, from Chapter 27:
Mrs. Khaparde was faithful and devout, and loved Baba deeply. Every noon she brought naivedya herself to the Masjid, and after it was accepted by Baba, she used to return and take her meals. Seeing her steady and firm devotion, Baba wanted to exhibit it to others. One noon she brought a dish containing Sanza (wheat-pudding), purees, rice, soup, and kheer (sweet rice) and other sundry articles to the Masjid. Baba, who usually waited for hours, got up at once, went up to His dining seat and removing the outer covering from the dish began to partake of the things zealously. Shama then asked Him - "Why this partiality? You throw away dishes of others and do not care to look at them, but this You draw to You earnestly and do justice to it. Why is the dish of this woman so sweet? This is a problem to us."

The incident that moves me the most on these lines is this from the Gospel: (page 705, bottom)
Sri Ramakrishna took some refreshments and handed some to Narendra.
JATIN DEVA (to the Master): "You always say: 'Narendra, eat this! Eat that!' Are the rest of us fools? Are we like straw washed ashore by the flood-tide?"
The Master is at a loss for words and sidesteps:
The Master said laughingly to Narendra, "He is talking about you."
Sri Ramakrishna laughed and showed his affection to Jatin by touching his chin.
The Arabs say:
Better the ganji in the house than the feast in the neighbor's.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Feynman, the Comic


Late the night of 17th January, saw this on an Oprah mailer:
This 248-page graphic bio will keep you entranced from start to finish, mostly because Ottaviani (writer) and Myrick (illustrator) tell the very human story behind Feynman, who, it turns out, did everything from help create the atomic bomb to unearth the causes of the Challenger space shuttle disaster all with a sense of humor so goofy and endearing that you can't help falling in love with him.
Very unusual, a comic book on the life of Feynman, one of my idols! Always fooling around, he should have been called Feignman.

Immediately, checked it on amazon.com and, closer home, on flipkart.com.  The USD 18.93 vs. INR 1351 difference wasn't too much and it's, well, instant gratification with Flipkart ;-) Got it within two days, last evening.

Feynman, the Comic


Guess you'd appreciate the book much more if you have read the earlier books:
Some of the stuff that's more or less fully covered as described in the above books are:
His Stream of Consciousness experiment with sleep is one of my favorites: (snipped from Fearless in Siesta)
This "stream of consciousness" reminded me of a problem my father had given to me many years before. He said, "Suppose some Martians were to come down to earth, and Martians never slept, but instead were perpetually active. Suppose they didn't have this crazy phenomenon that we have, called sleep. So they ask you the question: 'How does it feel to go to sleep? What happens when you go to sleep? Do your thoughts suddenly stop, or do they move less aanndd lleeessss rraaaaapppppiidddddllllllllyyyyyyyyyyy yyy? How does the mind actually turn off?"
I got interested. Now I had to answer this question: How does the stream of consciousness end, when you go to sleep?
I also noticed that as you go to sleep the ideas continue, but they become less and less logically interconnected. You don't notice that they're not logically connected until you ask yourself, "What made me think of that?" and you try to work your way back, and often you can't remember what the hell did make you think of that!
So you get every illusion of logical connection, but the actual fact is that the thoughts become more and more cockeyed until they're completely disjointed, and beyond that, you fall asleep.
No Ordinary Genius



Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Swami Ranganathananda




Earlier this week, i revisited a lovely little bio of Swami Ranganathananda (aka Mini Vivekananda), whose guiding philosophy in life was:

Godward passion transmuted into manward love

It's very inspirational and i felt that some of the snippets should be shared:
This love of adventure and dislike for an easy life, or as the German philosopher Nietzsche expressed in his dictum, "live dangerously" had been his trait from boyhood.

When Shankar [Swami R.] was 12 or 13 years old, once in his mother’s presence, he used some foul words against a person. His mother immediately reprimanded him, lovingly saying: "My boy, your tongue is the abode of Vâni or Saraswati, the Goddess of knowledge and wisdom. Don't soil it by using foul language against others." The advice, he said, went straight to his head and heart. Little wonder then that the Goddess manifested so tangibly through his blessed tongue for over eight decades.

One particular sentence in this book left a lasting impression on Shankar: "Young people seek praise; but it is better to seek to be praise-worthy."

Sometime later, volleyball too captured his imagination. Even when he was a trustee of the Sangha, he would play volleyball with the brahmacharis of the Training Centre at Belur Math. A senior monk recalled that once, when Maharaj saw a volleyball match in progress, he immediately adjusted his dhoti and joined the players!

Here perhaps were put together the chemicals for evolving Vedantic Thought Bombs (his words) which, in the not-too-distant future, he was to throw at unsuspecting audiences the world over, regardless of religion or caste, gender or nationality, civilian or military, young or old!

In 1942, during the Second World War, when Japan bombed Burma (Myanmar today) and the centre had to be wound up, Maharaj came back to Dhaka preferring the adventurous land route trekking along with thousands of other refugees, although more comfortable alternatives were available.

Madhavanandaji did attend Maharaj's lectures subsequently and commented to another sadhu, Thakur Shankarke kole niye khela khelcchen [Taking Shankar on his lap, Thakur (Sri Ramakrishna) is playing].

Sri Ramakrishna used to say: "A man may live in a mountain cave, smear his body with ashes, observe fasts, and practice austere discipline, but if his mind dwells on worldly objects, on lust and gold, I would say 'Fie on him!' But I would say that a man is indeed blessed if he eats, drinks and roams about but keeps his mind free from lust and gold." The truth of this statement was seen in Shankar Maharaj. He never cared for austerities or external observances. But he built a strong character based on absolute purity. This gave him not only great inner strength but also inner freedom. Because he was inwardly free he was always happy, could mix with all freely and do all his work with innocent cheerfulness. He maintained this innocent cheerfulness throughout his life.

"I have always maintained that I am a Swami of the Ramakrishna Order. Nothing more can be added to that. It is the biggest title."

Study was indeed a passion with him. He would often remark that if the Goddess of wealth, Lakshmi, was invoked alone she might run away after some time. But if the Goddess of Learning, Saraswati (Vâni, as she is also known, was a word which Maharaj liked very much) was first invoked, Lakshmi also would come, and the two sisters would stay with us always.

Swami R's feedback to a pujari who berates some noisy devotees in a Hyderabad temple, quoting the start of Speak Gently by David Bates:

Speak gently; it is better far
To rule by love than fear;
Speak gently; let no harsh words mar
The good we might do here!
Once again, here's the bio (just 44 pages) and the Kindle version.



The Curious Case of Benjamin Button


Even though it's been quite a while since it was released, i had the exquisite pleasure of watching The Curious Case of Benjamin Button last Saturday (14.JAN) evening.


Started the DVD as a lark, but was hooked throughout. Even popped a beer in between.

Brad Pitt was, as usual, eminently watchable, but i loved his voice even more. The scene where Cate Blanchett dances for Brad Pitt strongly reminded me of that GBSism:
Dancing: The vertical expression of a horizontal desire legalized by music.
The pace is all relaxed, and great thoughts / quotes shimmered right through the movie:
Benjamin Button: It's funny how sometimes the people we remember the least make the greatest impression on us.

Mrs. Maple: [at piano] "It's not about how well you play, it's how you feel about what you play."
That last one brought back fond memories of Mallikarjun "Anna" Mansur: (snipped from Musically Yours)
Someone asked Anna, "Anna, isn’t the pursuit of music full of hardship?" Anna replied, "Hardship? How can music have hardship? It is my good fortune that I became a singer. In our world, there are no hardships, only pleasure."

Monday, January 16, 2012

Innativity


Some of the elements of this post came from the deep early this morning

Over the weekend, kiddo was wondering about RAR files and how they are used.  There was some discussion going on among his friends, and he wanted to get to the bottom of how they worked.

In my Engineering days at AU, there was this Civil Engg. professor who used to be interested in English as well.  So i would bother him about words like naïve/té and how they were pronounced.  Indian languages are WYSIWYS (What you say is what you see) but the Roman languages have many idiosyn-crazies.  I used to think that was a big deal when i didn't know any better, but now i feel it's just plain silly, esp. the intellectual snobbery / superciliousness that people generally exhibit when you say foreign words the wrong way: "Oh, you don’t know how to say that whatchamacallit, you are a hillbilly."  Sivaji Ganesan was wonderful in that sense: "I can speak my mother tongue correctly, but it's too much to expect me to speak other languages the same way" (see Blindspotting as well).

So i told him there was nothing to it.  All it required was a Google Search and some amount of working with .RAR files.

Of course, there are things that one can never understand due to the intellectual bandwidth: once i saw a one-line piece of code with a self-referential expression to check whether a file was properly named; it scared me.  And even if i grow to be old as Methuselah, i don't think i will get to first base with the Google Search algorithm.

But RAR files are OK.


Anyway the very first chapter (after the massive Introduction) of the Gospel shows the path:
After a few minutes Sri Ramakrishna looked at him [M., the author of the Gospel] kindly and said affectionately: "You see, you have certain good signs. I know them by looking at a person's forehead, his eyes, and so on. Tell me, now, what kind of person is your wife? Has she spiritual attributes, or is she under the power of avidya?" M: "She is all right. But I am afraid she is ignorant."
MASTER(with evident displeasure): "And you are a man of knowledge!"
M. had yet to learn the distinction between knowledge and ignorance. Up to this time his conception had been that one got knowledge from books and schools. Later on he gave up this false conception. He was taught that to know God is knowledge, and not to know Him, ignorance.
Swami Ranganathananda (here's a lovely little bio of this Mini Vivekananda) explained this in a most elegant manner: (from "I am Thee; I am Free")
Einstein said: "Science can denature plutonium, but it cannot denature evil in the heart of man." So, there must be another dimension to science and truth-seeking; something experiential. Vedanta says that in the inner world, all knowing tends to being; when you try to know your own true nature, you realise that you are That. In the external world, it is never so. I study a star, I do not become a star; if I study a table, I do not become a table. But when you study yourself in depth, you become That. A wonderful change comes over you.
So whether you are interested in how to pronounce naïveté or the innativity of the Christ Consciousness that pervades everything is something to make up your mind about.

"I AM THAT"—Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj

Thursday, January 12, 2012

No Pussyfooting


Celibacy is not hereditary.

Today's AHAM has Ramana Sadguru saying it as it is!
Q: At Sri Aurobindo's Ashram there is a strict rule that married couples can live there on condition that they abstain from sexual intercourse.
M: What use is that? If it exists in the mind, what use is there in forcing people to abstain?
Ramana used to say that Brahmacharya meant moving around in Brahman, and not celibacy as commonly understood.

The birthday guru, Swami Vivekananda, makes a wonderful point.  In Life of Swami Brahmananda, we read:
Rakhal: "Many people mistakenly imagine that it is enough if one avoids the company of women, but Naren expressed the truth beautifully last night. He said: 'Woman exists for man as long as he has lust. When you are free from lust you do not see any difference between the sexes.'"
In the Shri Sai Satcharita, Shirdi Sai Baba advises Nanasaheb Chandorkar, agitated on seeing the rare beauty of a Muslim lady who had come for Baba's darshan: (snipped from Horse Sense)
"Nana, why are you getting agitated in vain? Let the senses do their allotted work, or duty, we should not meddle with their work. God has created this beautiful world and it is our duty to appreciate its beauty. The mind will get steady and calm slowly and gradually. When the front door was open, why go by the back one? When the heart is pure, there is no difficulty, whatsoever. Why should one be afraid of any one if there be no evil thought in us? The eyes may do their work, why should you feel shy and tottering?"
Related: Love Gurus

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Books: Thinking, Fast and Slow



Thanks to this DelanceyPlace post we are blind to our blindnessi have been introduced to Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman.

An intriguing book that sort takes off from Malcolm Gladwell's Blink (on Amazon.com).

It introduces us to the fast and intuitive System 1 as well as the slow and deliberate System 2.  System 1 can't be turned off, while System 2 is all about ensuring self-control. Check out what happens when System 2 takes a back-seat. Some great dancing perhaps ;-)

Downloaded the free Kindle sample (USD 9.99), but the hardcopy on Flipkart was going for cheaper (INR 349).  Also, there was a review on the Kindle page that the eBook wasn't that properly formatted.

Though the book keeps saying that it's easier to see the biases [everyone's bi-assed ;-)] of others, i am trying to understand System 1 and System 2 from a spiritual viewpoint.

For instance, System 1 can be thought of being about reactions while System 2, being deliberate, is more about responses.

Can one reduce the System 1 reactions that one is hardwired with and adopt the more responsive actions of System 2?

Or does one need a solid jolt to the system? As the Master says in the Gospel: "Once lightning hit the Kali temple. The points of the nails and screws were flattened."

Anyway, the book is looking very interesting. Let's see.

Terms of Endreament


Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to receive

Wonder whether this has ever happened to you, but every once in a while, a disconcerting thing keeps occurring: my dream memory gets mixed up with my regular life memory.

Since cues are used to fire memories and they are normally very short in duration (time-slice), IMHO that's what creates the confusion. It's not clear to the system where that cue occurred and the memory thread that it retrieves could be from either the dream database or the real-life database.

As it is, i don't really believe that real life is any different from a dream. It's just that it's phenomenally long (~14 billion years at last count) and detailed. More in Is the Universe a Dream of God?

Wonder whether such beliefs have any effect on what's retrieved. But the head becomes a confusing miasma in a very short time.

To extricate oneself from implosion, have to do some pinching of the self: such as blog/g+ing :-)

Friday, January 06, 2012

Arunachala Magica

అరుణాచలా మజాకా?!


Sometime back, PrasanthJ sent me some radical stuff:
Deepak Chopra Says there there is no way to prove existence of an outside world
Any neurologist will assure you that the brain offers no proof that the outside world really exists and many hints that it doesn’t.
The cortex doesn’t inform us about this never-ending data processing, which is all that is happening inside gray matter. Instead, the cortex tells us about the world—it allows us to perceive sights, sounds, tastes, smells, and textures—the whole array of creation. The brain has pulled an enormous trick on us, a remarkable sleight of hand, because there is no direct connection between the body’s raw data and our subjective sense of an outside world.
This dovetailed very neatly with that Superparadigm article by Peter Russell, which convinced me of the Formless:
All that I see, hear, taste, touch, smell and feel has been created from the data received by my sensory organs. All I ever know of the world around are the mental images constructed from that data. However real and external they may seem, they are all phenomena within my mind.
What happens when some of the sensory organs go kaput?  PSM sent me a very interesting XP on that recently:
Expansion and Dr. Jill Taylor's Talk
Are Brains Wired for Enlightenment?
A stroke shut down half of a brain scientist's brain. Cornered in the other half, she plunged into a samadhi-like state of love, bliss and insight

Albert Einstein observed that the most incomprehensible thing about the Universe was that it was comprehensible.


But, if it's all happening within, there's really no big deal about understanding it.  This was why Ramana Sadguru said: "It's not the Universe that's vast but the human mind".


Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj took it one step further with His searing observation in I Am That:
"I am not a part of the world; the world is a part of me".


So how does one see things?  Ramana says: (Who Sees?)
You alone exist, O Heart, the radiance of awareness! In You a mysterious power dwells, a power which without You is nothing. From it [this power of manifestation] there proceeds, along with a perceiver, a series of subtle shadowy thoughts that, lit by the reflected light of the mind amid the whirl of prarabdha, appear within us as a shadowy spectacle of the world and appear without as the world perceived by the five senses as a film is projected through a lens. Whether perceived or unperceived, these [thoughts] are nothing apart from You, O Hill of Grace.
If you feel all this is a load of baloney, here's a simple test.  The next time you fall into deep sleep and wake up fully refreshed, try to ascertain where you were during that period.  You can't, because your mind was totally subsumed into the Great Infinite Spirit in your (spiritual) Heart.


No mind, only the I, and its accompanying Bliss.

In fact, reading the above by Ramana makes me wonder why Arunachala is regarded as the Sahasrara Chakra:
Kenneth Grant on Arunachala… In his work The Magical Revival Kenneth Grant writes of Arunachala as one of the global chakras.
"The supreme seat of energy - the Sahasrara Chakra - is not located within the physical body at all, but above the cranial suture, where, figuratively speaking, the Lotus of Infinite Light blooms and bathes with its perfume the subtle anatomy of man. The Sahasrara is the seat of the Atman, the True Self in Man which is known as the Brahman in the Cosmos. It is the Abode of Siva and is represented on earth by the Sacred Hill of Arunachala in South India. This is the cult-centre of the most profoundly spiritual Path now open to humanity, i.e. the Advaita-marg or Path of Non-duality.

Tuesday, January 03, 2012

A నామ for రామ


With the change of year, it's back to the start of Discourses and some profound stuff on nama:
Nama Imparted by a Sadguru
The question is often raised if one may begin to repeat a nama of one's own choice, or must one be first initiated by a sadguru and assigned a specific nama which he should then repeat? Nama is self-existent and complete in itself, and needs nothing else to make it perfect. And yet, nama imparted by a sadguru certainly is something very special, distinctive, in that it is reinforced by his spiritual strength and support, and consequently there is no scope for pride of doership to rise in the sadhaka's mind.  When a sadhaka repeats nama imparted by a sadguru, he gradually develops a relish, a zest for it, and in due course, derives a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction. It is therefore highly desirable that nama should be obtained by initiation by a spiritual master, a sadguru. However, till we meet a sadguru we must keep on repeating the nama of our choice; for, this itself will expedite our meeting the sadguru.
Ever since i got this wonderful book in DEC.2008 from Raavel via Sri BC Prasad Gaaru, i experimented with various nama, each one leading to the other.

On the Master's birthday (18.FEB) in 2010, i got How to Live with God:

Books: How to Live with God

Exactly one month later, on March 18, the birthday of Edgar Cayce, i was feeling, as Larry Darrell put it, "spiritually waterlogged".  It was a Thursday and i decided to skip the daily puja and read some stuff from HtLwG in the backyard.

And soon i found what i was looking for at the bottom of one of the pages:
M.* said: "Late in the evening the Master would chant this mantra, …. One can attain perfection or see God by repeating this mantra. The Master said: 'This is a mysterious mantra.'"
When i toted it up, it came to 41, that even more mysterious number:
Not only is 41 a prime, but (n^2 - n + 41) gives prime numbers for all n from 1 to 40 (n=0 is a trivial case)!…Check out the number you get when n=30 ;-)
What more can one ask for?  A magical mantra from the Master Himself.

Sunday, January 01, 2012

f2012


f for FAQ, figurative, function,…

Finally, THE year is here.  Instead of getting ribbed by all and sundry about the end of the world, here's a FAQ about what i feel about the year 2012:

Q. Will the world come to an end this year?
A. AFAIK, the world as we know it will come to an end.  But IMHO it's impossible to predict when that will happen.  In 1936, Edgar Cayce suggested 1998 as the year California will get inundated, but that date has come and gone.  I am more in sync with Peter Russell's idea that the 2012 date is figurative. He says that it's any date:
2012 ± 18 years.
Q. Why should the world come to an end?
A. John Ross observed:
Underground nuclear testing, defoliation of the rain forests, toxic waste ... Let's put it this way: if the world were a big apartment, we wouldn't get our deposit back.
Very soon, if not already, it will be Oceans of Nothing:
After studying, among other things, global catch data over more than 50 years, he and a team of 13 researchers in four countries have come to a stunning conclusion. By the middle of this century, fishermen will have almost nothing left to catch. "None of us regular working folk are going to be able to afford seafood," says Stephen Palumbi, a Stanford University marine biologist and co-author of the study published in Science. "It's going to be too rare and too expensive."
How long will any any intelligent being such as Mother Earth allow this sort of "snuff" to continue?  If the parasite is threatening to overrun the host, the host will shake it off like so many fleas of its back. Check out George Carlin's riff (at 4:24) in the video below:



Q. Will the end be sudden?
A. Yes, i feel so.  From 2012: The Tipping Point:
As a system undergoes changes, it keeps trying its best to jiggle back to an equilibrium state.  But after a point, it sort of can't do that.  Even when you think the system has sort of stabilized (as i was thinking at the end), it might just be preparing for an explosion (as it eventually did).
Q. Are there any triggers/indicators?
A. In Reading 270-35, given on January 21, 1936, Cayce had said: (from Vesuvi-US)
If there are the greater activities in the Vesuvius, or Pelee, then the southern coast of California--and the areas between Salt Lake and the southern portions of Nevada--may expect, within the three months following same, an inundation by the earthquakes.

There will be upheavals in the Arctic and Antarctic that will cause the eruption of volcanoes in the torrid areas, and pole shift.
Q. How will the world look?
A. This is, of course, very hard to say.  But here's one suggested map of the US post "2012":

Vesuvi-US

Q. What are the danger areas?
A. Apart from those indicated in the US map above with the usual suspects (LA, SF, NY), Scandinavia will have to watch out.  Cayce said that "Northern Europe" will change in the twinkling of an eye.  My own reason for that will be a megatsunami, which has been known to circle the globe many times!

Q. What can one do?
A. Guess there's hardly anything that one can do except prepare oneself mentally.  Reduce materialism.  Pray more.  Serve your fellow man/woman.  Get in sync with the Formless that's always there in the background, as a witness to phenomena.  Try to implement that great observation by Ramana Sadguru in Who am I?:
The mind should not be allowed to wander towards worldly objects and what concerns other people. However bad other people may be, one should bear no hatred for them. Both desire and hatred should be eschewed. All that one gives to others one gives to one's self. If this truth is understood who will not give to others? When one's self arises all arises; when one's self becomes quiescent all becomes quiescent. To the extent we behave with humility, to that extent there will result good. If the mind is rendered quiescent, one may live anywhere.

Here's a quote from Swami, from Dreams of 2012:
The dawn of the Golden Age is at hand. But not everyone will experience it. The age of preparation precedes the Golden Age and it is during this time that the sorting-out process takes place. So seize the opportunity that all of you have been given to rise above the material level and manifest once again in the divine state. Only then can you enter the Golden Age and experience the omnipresence of the Lord.
Peace be unto You!

Related: